The Bradley Method for the Control of Invasive Plants
An interesting approach to the control of invasive plants in
natural habitats is the Bradley method, first developed in Australia by the
late Joan Bradley and her sister Eileen. Outside of Australia it has apparently
only been used in California, but it should be applicable to most parts of the
world.
The Bradley method is first of all a “philosophy” of weed
control.
There are three basic principles:
1) Always work away from undisturbed natural areas toward
the weedy areas.
According
to the Bradleys, if native plants are given a chance they will recover the
ground that has been taken from them by weeds. The principal here is to start
in areas where the native plants are thriving and gradually clear into the
weedy areas. Weeds do not invade readily into areas where the native plants are
already well established.
If one clears weeds in the worst
areas first, this may not only be ineffective, it may be harmful. Removing
weeds in such areas exposes bare ground, tipping the balance in favor of the
weeds. On the other hand, weeding a little at a time within and adjacent to
good stands of native plants, moving toward the worst weed areas, gives the
natives a chance to move in and thrive.
2) While weeding, try to keep from disturbing the
environment any more than necessary.
Large
numbers of weed seeds rain down on natural areas. If the ground is opened,
these weed seeds can thrive. Undisturbed native soil, with its natural mulch,
is resistant to weed invasion.
3) Do not overclear
Leave
the natural area as undisturbed as possible. If a large team of workers is
available, people should spread out and weed small amounts in many places,
rather than having everybody weed in one place. The total area weeded will be
as large, but regeneration by native plants will be greater.
The Bradley method emphasizes that removing weeds from a
natural area involves two different kinds of time, working time and waiting
time. Patience is not only a virtue, it is essential.
The Bradley plan of approach
1) Start with areas where native plants are dominant. Weeds
may be scattered throughout, singly or in small groups. The risk of
overclearing here is nil, so this is the place to start. After clearing all the
weeds, return once or twice a year and remove any weeds that were missed, or
which have just grown.
2) Then move into areas of heavier weeds, where there is
some native undergrowth. Choose an area of substantial growth where native
plants are pushing up against a mixture of weeds and natives. Remove weeds in a
strip about 10 feet across, then stop and give the natives time to move into
the weeded areas. As the natives take hold, extend the strip along the
boundary.
3) Maintain the advantage already gained. It is important to
resist the temptation to clear deeper into the weeds before regenerating
natives have become established. Weed seeds will continue to germinate in newly
cleared areas, so they should be removed as soon as possible. This is more
important than starting to clear new areas.
4) Be very cautious in moving into the worst areas. However
ugly an area of solid weeds may look, do not start clearing it until the native
vegetation has been brought right up to it.
Although Joan and Eileen Bradley were trained as chemists,
their method makes very little use of herbicides. “We regenerate [native
vegetation] by using methods that give us the most effective kill of weeds and
the most bountiful growth of natives; that is, by skilful manual weeding. This
can be laborious, and we are often asked, especially when we are having to
spend a long time extracting a big weed ‘Why don’t you poison it?’ We prefer
not to use poisons if we can avoid it, and we certainly condemn their
indiscriminate use.”
I think the point here is to use herbicides in selective ways, rather than by broadcast spraying. Their reasoning is that herbicides are not truly selective,
may have detrimental effects on the environment, and do not always work.
However, they do admit that for some weeds, or for some areas, herbicides may
be necessary. However, their hand weeding technique is perfectly safe, highly
effective, and reliable. It does require one trait that we do not always have
or want to use: staying power.
Although I have generally approached a restoration area with the Bradley method in mind, I have not always used it. The "waiting time" that the Bradley method requires is not always available. However, we have always tried to start with the "good" areas first and then move into the "bad" ones. This is the most important part of the Bradley method.
Details of the Bradley method, including many practical
suggestions for weeding, have been published in a book called “Bringing back
the bush: The Bradley method of bush regeneration.” Lansdown Publishing Company,
The Rocks, New South Wales, Australia.
I obtained my copy from Books of Nature, P.O. Box 345,
Lindfield NSW 2070, Australia. http://www.booksofnature.com
An internet search for "Bradley Method" AND "Invasive Plants" will bring up quite a few "hits", including some further details under a Wikipedia page called "Bush regeneration".
Finally, those interested in the broader scope of restoration ecology should look into the Australian literature. Of all the countries outside of North America, Australia is probably the most advanced. In some ways they are ahead of us.
No comments:
Post a Comment