Tom's Blog

Friday, April 18, 2014

Good time to spray smooth brome

Smooth brome (Bromus inermis) is widespread in our area and is one of the most difficult species to get rid of. Several characteristics are particularly significant:

  • Cool season grass that gets started before any other plant
  • Rapid clonal spread via rhizomes
  • Effective spread via prolific flowering and seed production
  • Widespread in our part of the state
A burn will kill all the above-ground parts but about a week after the burn smooth brome starts to appear. Folks often remark favorably that our burnt prairies are already greening up. However, anything green this early is bad! The main advantage of these newly green patches is that they show us where the bad guys are.

Fortunately, this early growth provides the way of getting rid of smooth brome. Since nothing but smooth brome has come up yet, the offending patches can be killed by spraying with 2% glyphosate. This herbicide has the unique characteristic that is completely inactivated by soil particles. This means that it has no residual activity. Therefore, only plants that are green are killed. You can spray with impunity! Since we have already eliminated most of the large patches of smooth brome (as described in the link below), now we are only spot spraying, mainly road cuts.





Nice video on the importance of fire for the tallgrass prairie: Kansas

Preserving the tallgrass prairie
Kansas

Leads to a page with a 29 min YouTube video
Focus is on use of fire by private landowners

Nice that they call their tallgrass prairie a "National Treasure".

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Research and Restoration: A conflict of interests

Research work and restoration work are often in conflict. It is the purpose of this note to make a plea for the application of common sense in the selection of sites for research purposes. For instance, in southern Wisconsin we have very few high quality sites, and those that we do have are jewels deserving of constant care. Most are completely unsuitable for manipulative field research.

As an example of what I would consider an inappropriate research study is one on removal of aspen (Populus tremuloides) in one of southern Wisconsin’s highest quality sites, a State Natural Area. In this justly famous site, aspen had become a significant invader. The solution to this problem, girdling of the aspens, is well known. However, a decision was made by the managers of the site to do research on this aspen clone using a variety of control methods. Because of this, volunteers interested in preventing aspen spread were refused permission to carry out any aspen control work. In the meantime, the aspen clone continued to expand. What a waste, since in southern Wisconsin there are large numbers of aspen clones on sites of little or no ecological interest, which would have been perfectly suited for this research. Why should this high quality remnant be allowed to become degraded? Common sense would suggest otherwise.

Another example involved a study on the ecology of garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), a highly invasive exotic. Garlic mustard is widespread in southern Wisconsin and there are numerous highly degraded sites where it can be studied. However, the study in question used a high quality site where efforts by volunteers to remove this plant had been underway for a number of years. The researchers appropriated a significant portion of this site and part of the research involved allowing garlic mustard plants to remain intact (as controls). In addition to permitting the plants to remain on the site, this research sent an inappropriate message to volunteers, who had been working diligently to remove every vestige of this highly invasive plant.

On the other hand, here is an example of what I would consider appropriate research in a high quality site. In another State Natural Area, a researcher interested in population genetics of a particular plant species was interested in obtaining leaf samples for DNA analysis. Small samples were taken from a number of plants on this site. The plants were barely disturbed and there was no manipulation of the site as a whole.

Land managers responsible for the control of high quality natural areas should consider carefully the appropriateness of manipulative research on their sites, especially if the research requires that needed restoration work be held in abeyance. Most high quality natural areas require on-going maintenance and are not suitable research areas. Restoration ecologists should be challenged to find and set aside field sites where manipulative research is possible.

Friday, April 11, 2014

Burn-induced mortality of a mature bur oak

Bur oaks are very resistant to damage by fire. However, they do age and the trunks do get hollow, opening them up to fire damage.

In our savanna burn of last Sunday, one of our largest oaks (Tree #720 in our database; located in Unit 10), caught fire internally. Although alive, this 21.8 inches diameter oak had a large hollow trunk. In addition, there was a large knot about 8 feet from the bottom, also hollow, and this hollow connected to the main trunk. During the savanna burn, wind must have swept sparks into this open knot and started a fire, which spread into the middle of the tree. The upper part of the tree was leaning and its weight, as the trunk was weakened by the fire, pulled the whole tree over. (See photos)

Tree 720 down the day after the savanna burn

Close-up of the trunk and bole of tree 720

Just before the burn in Unit 10. Tree #720 is nearby. The fuel here is predominantly Indian grass.

After the burn. Parts of Tree 720 can be seen at the right.
Although this was the largest oak that fell as a result of the burn, there were about 10 other smaller oaks that came down.

Although the loss of large oaks is sad, it is inevitable in a fire-controlled savanna. In fact, this is one of the ways the canopy stays open. And if the canopy were not open, warm season grasses such as Indian grass could not flourish.

The oak savanna of Pleasant Valley Conservancy is not a backyard garden, where every tree is protected, but a natural landscape!



Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Big oak savanna burn 4-6-2014

Last Sunday we had very favorable weather and a great crew and got almost all of our remaining burns finished. See this post for the earlier burn.

Burn crew getting ready to start the big savanna burn
GIS map of the Apr 6 burns. The area shown in green was burned first and the gray last.
The savanna burn was especially complicated because the fuel was so lush. With a south wind, we backburned as much as possible. (See photo below) Even with backburns, flame heights occasionally flared up.
The fire moving down through unit 11D savanna. Note how lush the fuel is.
There was quite a bit of mop-up, and a few large trees that had hollow trunks caught on fire and fell. Although we love each individual tree, we realize that in a fire-controlled oak savanna some older trees will fall.

After the burn, unit 10, the large bur oak savanna on the ridge top. The lighter colored area in the distance is the top of the south-facing slope that was burned the week before. 
After the burn, large white oaks on the lower savanna slope.
After a late lunch we moved to the east end of the Conservancy and burned the East Basin and Ridge Prairies and the associated oak woods, another 11 acres.

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Tricky controlled burn near buildings

After we finished our large south-slope burn on Saturday, we did several  planted prairies nearby. Due to the weather and the lush fuel, these burns took more time/people than the much larger south-slope burn. Especially difficult was the series of small prairie units near our buildings. (These prairies were planted here originally for demonstration purposes.)

The three small buildings here are the cabin, which functions as a small field station, the well house which is an essential source of water, and the privy, also essential.

Burning the Cabin Prairies
The photo above shows the crowd of people involved. There was only one drip torch, but lots of water.

The most important tools were the two pumper units in the ATVs. The water in these units had good pressure and long reaches and served to keep the flame heights low. In addition, we had 4 people with water backcans, who were able to accurately place water where it was needed.

Other planted prairies that we burned were the Valley and Crane Prairies, both of which have complex habitats, varying from wet prairie near the bottom to dry prairie at the top near Pleasant Valley Road.



Monday, March 31, 2014

Challenging prairie/savanna burn in hill country

The weather finally cooperated and we were able to accomplish a large south-slope burn on Saturday March 29, 2014.  However, the burn did not go the way I had anticipated.

After a mild rain on Thursday the weather gradually cleared. Friday night the clouds vanished and Saturday dawned clear and sunny. By 10 AM, when we assembled for the burn, the humidity was about 50% and temperature 45 F. Our lush fuel, primarily little bluestem and Indian grass, quickly dried off.

Because the wind was out of the northeast, we had to completely change our plans. Fortunately, we had a large, experienced, crew (16 people), two pumper units, and plenty of water and drip torch fuel. We also had a good Kenwood two-way radio for each person, so everyone knew what was going on. (Thanks to Rich Henderson and Chris Kirkpatrick of The Prairie Enthusiasts for handling the FCC authorization on these radios.)

We have burned this steep hill many times but this was the first time we had to start at the opposite end of the ridge. Lighting started at the top, at what we call the Far Overlook, backburning down the hill. The line moving west started down the ridge almost immediately, and had the west end tied off very soon. The long line moving east took much longer.

Backburning down the south slope at the start of the west-moving line.



Half way along the long east line, backburning through a prairie remnant lush with tall Indian grass. Lots of water was needed here to keep the fire from creeping into the savannas above.

Near the end of the long east line. Denny's Polaris ATV was able to navigate the rather tricky side slope of the fire break at the top of the hill. Kathie ran the  Kawasaki Mule with pumper unit (see photo below).


At the east end of the ridge it was necessary to tie off the burn unit adjacent to the Basin Savanna. Kathie backed up the hill along the break so that the hose of the pumper could wetline the whole break. In addition, six crew members had water backcans to take care of any spot fires.
Amanda lighting. To speed  up the burn, several drip torches lighted below the upper fire line once a good blackline had been created at the top. Photo by Michael Vahldieck


View of the south slope from Pleasant Valley Road. Since most of the slope was now black, a headfire was used to complete the burn. (Photo by Michael Vahldieck)
Although most of the fuel was warm-season grasses, the areas under the bur oaks near the top of the hill were too shady for grasses. Although the sun had dried them off, they burned in typical savanna fashion as a slowly moving line of ankle-height flame. Thus, the burn crew had to contend with alternating areas of high and low flames.

The whole burn, 15 acres, took 2 hours to complete. After lunch we burned 10 acres of planted prairies.