Tom's Blog

Friday, February 24, 2017

Tree-centered spot firing to protect special trees

Savanna burns can present problems when special trees are present within lush prairie grass. Flame heights may often be high, and may seriously damage even upper tree branches. Under such conditions, the technique of tree-centered spot firing can be used.

Tree-centered spot firing was described in 1989 by Weatherspoon et al. of the U.S. Forest Service. See link

With tree-centered spot firing, the bases of trees to be protected are lighted by a crew member moving ahead of the flaming front. A few drops of fire is all it takes to blacken the base of the tree. When the flaming front reaches that tree the flames drop and the tree is unharmed.

Our burn crew has been using this technique for the past several years. It takes an additional crew member but perhaps saves mop-up time at the end of the burn. Also, once the trees are protected, this crew member can proceed to interior lighting, which is almost always necessary on a savanna burn.

One might ask whether this precaution is necessary for bur oaks, which are generally quite fire resistant. We use this mainly for smaller specimens, which are less fire tolerant, as a precautionary measure.

Spot firing around some small bur oaks creates a black area and protects the trees

C. Philip Weatherspoon, George A. Almond, and Carl N. Skinner. 1989. “Tree-centered spot firing---a technique for prescribed burning beneath standing trees.” Western Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 4: 29-31.

Thursday, February 23, 2017

First burn of the season at Pleasant Valley Conservancy

We keep pushing the burn season further back toward winter! Ten years ago we generally did our first burn in early April. In 2015 we did the first burn on March 18. Last year it was March 11. And now this year, February 22.

This year the Madison area had a record warm spell over the past week, with temperatures reaching the upper 60s. (The Winter Festival at Elver Park almost didn't happen on February 19!) Fortunately, due to Amanda's diligence and foresight, we weren't caught off guard. [The general rule for successful burns is: when conditions are right, burn burn burn!]

Our 2017 burn plans are shown at the end of this post. Burn #1 was what we did today.

We had a crew of 13 and all equipment was ready to go. Despite the dew on the grass at daybreak, by 10:30 AM, with a full sun and humidity below 50%, conditions were great and we started lighting.

The main burn (see map) included two ridge-top savannas and the large prairie/savanna remnant on the south-facing slope (27 acres). The latter burn is interesting because once the blacklines are in, it mostly takes care of itself. This burn was finished at 12:30 PM.

After lunch, we burned the long strip of planted prairies south of Pleasant Valley Road. Because of the complicated edges and various structures to protect, the afternoon burn took longer than the morning, although we were finished with everything by 4:00 PM.

Starting the ridge-top savanna burn.
Most of the burn was either a backing or flanking burn. Because of the lush fuel, the fire carried well.

Flanking fire across the south slope. The principal fuel here was warm-season grasses, Indian grass and little bluestem. Note how rocky the south slope is.
Kathie and Denny monitoring the savanna burn. The savanna on the right will be part of Burn #2, to be done sometime in March.
The burn is almost complete. Within seconds this fuel was gone and the fire was out. Only a few "smokers" were evident, mainly downed dead logs. Since they were well inside the burn unit, they were allowed to burn.

Saturday, February 18, 2017

A Scientist in Yellowstone National Park: A Memoir

Scientific research is a glorious occupation, and probably no category is more fascinating than field work in a National Park such as Yellowstone. It was my good fortune to have been able to carry out research in the Park with a dedicated group of students and research associates for over 10 years and to remain associated with the Park for much longer.

This work is described in detail in the memoir I have just written: “A Scientist in Yellowstone National Park”, which is available for download at the following link:

Although what we did was basic research, a major practical application came from it, due to the discovery by Hudson Freeze and myself of the bacterium Thermus aquaticus. This became the source of the enzyme Taq polymerase, which made the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) practical, thus revolutionizing research on DNA.

The research discussed here depended greatly on financial support from two federal agencies, the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (now subsumed under the Department of Energy). It also depended greatly on support in numerous ways from the two universities where I was employed, Indiana University-Bloomington, and University of Wisconsin-Madison. Finally, since its inception Yellowstone National Park has recognized and encouraged scientific research in the Park, and without the Park’s permission, none of this work could have been carried out.

It is a truism in science that basic research is the foundation from which applications arise. My Yellowstone research is one of the best examples of this truism, and has been so recognized in many news media and publications.

Although this book might be called a “memoir”, I emphasize that it is not based on memory, but on documents that were created at the time. It is thus closer to “real” history of science than to a memoir. In the same way, the numerous photographs reproduced here were taken at the time of the events.

Friday, February 10, 2017

Where on a site are the oldest bur oaks?

Last night at the Blue Mounds Area Project meeting, part of Jeb Barzen's interesting discussion was on the remnant prairie/savanna at Wollersheim Winery. This site is famous in restoration ecology because of the availability of an 1870 photo taken of the bluff. (Early photos like this are quite rare.)

In those days, the bluff prairie almost certainly burned frequently, probably annually. The only trees visible are a few right at the top of the bluff. Barzen told us that these trees are still present and that they are bur oaks. Interestingly, they are not situated at the "top" of the bluff, but some distance farther along the level. Why? Probably because the steep topography causes the up-slope burn as a headfire, but once the fire reaches the level, the headfire turns into a gentle fire before it goes out completely.

I discussed the relationship between bur oaks and fire in a blog post in 2014. See this link for details, photos, and a map.

At Pleasant Valley Conservancy we know that all of our really ancient bur oaks are just a bit down hill on the north side from the ridge top, where (as noted above) the fire goes out.

Headfire roaring up the south slope. Although the trunks of bur oaks are fire resistant, their upper branches are less so and can be seriously damaged. This photo was taken in 2005. This large headfire was a surprise to us. We had been burning the south slope since 1998, right after restoration was completed. Initially, the prairie grasses were only in scattered patches and did not carry a fire well. But by 2005 everything changed.
Now to protect the venerable bur oaks we only burn this slope as a backing fire.

Friday, January 27, 2017

Restoration chronology at Pleasant Valley Conservancy

Digging through my files, I ran across this nice map of the restoration history of Pleasant Valley Conservancy I prepared back in 2014. It's out of date but still useful. It shows how long it takes to do restoration work.

If  you want to get an idea of acreage, look at this link, which has a table of the acres of each unit on the map.

I'm posting this fairly large, so users will have to scroll across to see the whole area.

Not shown on this map is all the work we have been doing on the wetlands. That will come later.

Incidentally, we think we have finally figured out how to burn a substantial part of our wetland this year, and have fire breaks already in place.

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

The Fire Science consortiums

It is still January, but it is not too early to think about spring burns.

Right now is a good time to get more fire knowledge from the great webinars sponsored by the U.S. Joint Fire Science Program. Each region of the country has a Fire Science Consortium that sponsors meetings, field trips, research programs, and (best of all) on-line seminars (called "webinars"), that are presented by fire science experts.

As the map shows, every section of the country has a fire science consortium, and their activities and events are open to anyone.

I've been attending fire science webinars for some years now, and I learn something useful at every one I have attended. Three separate consortia deal with my area of interest: Tallgrass, Lake States, and Oak Woodlands. I also attend some of those from the South, since these are the people who have the strongest prescribed burn programs. And one time I even attended one from California, which, predictably, was dealing with suppression rather than prescription.

Although all of these webinars are presented "live", they are also archived, so if you miss one  you can get it later.

Do a search for "Fire Science Consortium" with one or another of the consortium names (from the map above), and look for the link that says "webinar." You'll get a list of past webinars, any of which you should be able to access.

Webinars seem to use something called "Adobe Connect", which you should be able to install on  your computer for free. Once  you have it on  your computer, double-clicking the link to a webinar title should bring it up.

Since oak savanna is one of my main interests, I naturally focus on those webinars dealing with fire and oaks. One of the best webinars dealing with oaks was Greg Nowacki's webinar on oak, fire, and mesophication, presented for the Oak Woodlands Consortium on Decemeber 10, 2013, and still available online.

One neat thing about the presentation window is that there is a box on one side that shows the names of all those who are attending "live." Go through that list and you might see someone you know.

A nice thing about watching an archived talk is that  you can stop it anytime  you want and return. If you see a nice burn photo or an interesting graph, you can take a picture with your camera or download a screenshot.

Remember, these consortia are funded by the Joint Fire Science Program, and each consortium has at least one paid staff person who is working hard to put these programs together. Each consortium also has a principal investigator and an advisory board.

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Buckthorn: Before and After Eradication

When we started restoration work at Pleasant Valley Conservancy in 1997 (almost 20 years ago), most of our savanna areas with calcareous soils were solid buckthorn. I remember those days but could not find any photos that showed it. Recently, digging through boxes of photos from those pre-digital days, I ran across this delightful photo from 1985!

Family photo from 1985 showing wall of buckthorn
I don't know the exact location, but I believe it is at the edge of the Unit 10 savanna. I remember that we climbed up to the top of the ridge and then, exhausted, sat down while Kathie took our picture.

The dense buckthorn thicket behind us is typical of what was there before restoration. You could not walk through the area without bushwacking. After the leaves came out, you could not see the big trees inside of the savanna.

I looked for a photo taken after restoration from a similar area. (Most of my digital photos have been indexed in Excel.) The one shown below is approximately the same site.

Photo of Unit 10 savanna taken in October 2010.
This savanna was cleared in 2001-2002. It has been burned annually ever since. At first it was hard to get the area to burn, but after a few years the new understory vegetation started to provide great fuel for burns.

How did we get rid of all that buckthorn? Originally by basal bark treatment with Garlon 4 in oil. (We used to buy a Garlon 4 pre-mix product in 6 gallon pails.) Pat Schrader did most of the work. He set up 100-foot-wide swaths, starting at one edge of the unit and moving all the way through to the other edge. Most of this work was done in the winter. (In those days we had some mostly snow-free winters.) The following growing season the treated buckthorn did not leaf out. After two or three years, the dead roots rotted off and the plants could be easily pushed over by hand. They then provided a good base for a burn pile.

I think this sort of basal bark treatment is the best way to get rid of buckthorn patches as dense as these. It is lots less time consuming than cutting and treating the cut stems with herbicide, providing you aren't in a hurry to get the area cleared.

Just to be clear: getting rid of the big buckthorns did not get rid of the buckthorn! There was a seed bank, as well as lots of dormant buds on underground root collars, some of which resprouted years later. I discuss this phenomenon in a separate post.

But with persistence we have now virtually eradicated buckthorn from our savannas!