Tom's Blog

Thursday, June 7, 2018

10th anniversary of Pleasant Valley Conservancy State Natural Area

Although Pleasant Valley Conservancy State Natural Area was actually created when Governor Jim Doyle signed the official document in 2007, the dedication ceremony was not held until 2008. Today is the 10th anniversary of that ceremony.


June 7, 2008
1:00 PM-1:30 PM
Pleasant Valley Conservancy State Natural Area
Town of Vermont, Dane County, Wisconsin

Evanne Hunt, President, The Prairie Enthusiasts

Signe L. Holtz, Director, Bureau of Endangered Resources, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

Mark Martin, Natural Areas Specialist, WDNR

Richard Henderson, Vice President, The Prairie Enthusiasts and President, Empire-Sauk Chapter, Prairie Enthusiasts

Darcy Kind, Landowner Incentive Program Conservation Biologist, WDNR

Kathie and Tom Brock, Landowners, The Savanna Oak Foundation, Inc.

Field Trips
1:30-3:30 PM

Prairies and Savannas at Pleasant Valley Conservancy: Rich Henderson

Wetlands and Reed Canary Grass Research at Pleasant Valley Conservancy: Craig Annen, Integrated Restorations, Inc.

Birds: Dave Sample, Research Scientist, WDNR

How the Restoration Work Was Carried Out, Willis Brown, Michler and Brown, LLC

How We Got Started: Kathie and Tom Brock

Refreshments After the Tours

Exhibits and Refreshments in the Barn

See Over for Public Trail Map

 We had sent out invitations to various mailing lists, and the event was announced in the local papers. We set up a registration table under a shade tree, and provided name tags. The count (I still have the sign-up sheets) was 118, and there were probably some who did not register.

Anticipating a good turnout, we set up several field trips, some short, some long. The trips are shown on the program.

Kathie and I chose Saturday June 7 as the dedication date because the Conservancy would be looking fresh and lush, and the weather was likely to be good. We had had a very successful spring burn season. Unfortunately, the weather made a wild change in mid-afternoon, ushering in a weekend of heavy rainfall. We missed the line of tornadoes that streamed across northern Illinois but not the “historic” flooding that inundated southern Wisconsin. This was the weekend that Lake Delton disappeared and Lake Mendota overflowed its banks.

Fortunately, most of the “events” occurred before the rains came, although most of the field trip participants got soaked, and moved eagerly into the barn where the refreshments were laid out. Those significant numbers who came on bicycles had a little trouble getting home.

Photos by Jim Hess

Registration table

Tom and Kathie

The "ceremony" took place near the cabin


Rich Henderson's field trip was well attended

After the deluge

National Weather Service
Historic Flooding of June 7- 8, 2008
2008 blog post on the flooding.

The next day
As it happened, on Sunday morning June 8 Kathie and I and Roma Lenehan were scheduled to lead a birds and wildflower trip for the Natural Resources Foundation. Despite the threatening weather, 20 people showed up for the trip to start at 9:00 AM. The heavens opened up at 8:55 AM and blinding rain occurred until 11 AM. The three leaders lectured in the barn, using the exhibits that were still standing from the day before, until the rain stopped. When we finally could hike we even saw some birds!

Thursday, May 10, 2018

Invasive plants: Complete eradication is important!

How important is it to eradicate "all" the bad guys? I posted on this some years ago, but it deserves repeating.

One important part of restoration work is planning brush and weed removal. The question often arises: how important is it to get rid of "all" of the invasives? Eradication is expensive; do we really need to eliminate every last sweet clover sprig or buckthorn stem?

If one is thinking of the long term, the answer to this question is "Yes". The reason? Because annual stewardship cannot be assured. All sorts of reasons might arise that would prevent continued restoration on a preserve. Money problems first come to mind, but passing on or moving away of key personnel may be more important. What happens if work is stopped on a site before it is completely cleared of bad stuff? In a few years, bad plants will start to appear, and in a few more years there will be more.

At first these "stragglers" may seem acceptable, but this is just what microbiologists call the "lag" phase. Eventually the "log" phase is reached, and the site will suddenly "explode" with invasive plants. With exponential growth, it is the last doubling that turns the site from tolerable to hopeless. One year the site may look more or less OK and the next year it is ruined. That final point where everything suddenly becomes ruined is sometimes called the “tipping point”.

However, if the bad stuff has been completely eradicated, then the site should be able to stand some neglect, with perhaps just an annual or biennial prescribed burn. (But don't count on burns to get rid of new invaders! This won't happen.)

Even more important: if all invaders have been eradicated, it becomes a very inexpensive process to remove the few new ones that move in from outside. One or two passes through this blissful preserve may be all that is necessary each year.

Thinking of the budgetary and personnel problems, which is more important? A smaller area completely restored, or a larger area partly restored? The answer to this interesting question may depend to a great extent on the goals.

For instance, if the goal is to provide habitat for grassland birds, then large open areas are critical, but they may not need to be completely weed free. Indeed, some grassland bird species seem to be reasonably happy with a field of Queen Anne’s lace or even an alfalfa field, as long as it isn’t mowed too early.

But if the goal is preservation of plant diversity, then smaller sites with high botanical quality will be more important.

The ideal time to canvas a fully restored site for new invaders is mid-October, when the native vegetation has senesced. Exotic invaders such as buckthorn and honeysuckle keep their green leaves longer, and the occasional straggler (or new invader) really stands out. Carry a backpack sprayer filled with aqueous Garlon 3A or glyphosate (foliar spray concentration) and spray the green leaves. The senesced native vegetation will not be hurt, and the invader will be killed.

Honeysuckle green among the senesced native vegetation. Perfect time to spray.

Even a single buckthorn plant can be found hidden among the native vegetation!

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

Plant ecology and soil characteristics of a Midwestern bluff prairie

 What we call the South Slope is a classic Midwestern bluff prairie. A few years ago (2014) Peter Hartman and crew from the USDA-NRCS came and studied our South Slope as part of their work to develop a “site description” for bluff prairies.

Our South Slope is part of what the NRCS calls the Northern Mississippi Valley Loess Hills, a region which includes parts of four states: Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, and Illinois. Two other terms sometime used are the “Driftless Area” and the “Paleozoic Plateau”. The latter term is used because the bedrock formations are from the Paleozoic Era, sedimentary dolomites and sandstones from the Ordovician and Cambrian Periods.

The soils were formed during the 450-500 million years since the rocks were first laid down, and then were followed during the last (Wisconsin) glaciation by a layer of fine silt (loess). This loess layer was laid down during a xeric period after the glacier had receded (10-15,000 years ago).

Most importantly, the steep bluffs are covered by colluvium, a term which describes the loose rocky fragments that move downslope either by rainfall or by slow down-slope “creep”.  These extremely rocky soils are called sometimes called flaggy (like being derived from flagstone), channery (with flat coarse fragments) or cobbly (rounded stones). These are more refined terms for soils I have always just called “rocky”.

The rocks and other fragments derived from bedrock are especially obvious after a burn.

I had always assumed that if our soils were so rocky that bedrock was right below the surface, so there was essentially no soil at all. Wrong! The soil layer is many feet thick!

The photo shows the site crew at work. Note the tall thin rod with a handle at the top. One of the crew members actually inserted that rod into the bluff all the way up to the hilt, five feet. Indeed, according to the site description, these soils are 4-5 feet thick.

Peter Hartman and his NRCS crew working on the South Slope (Unit 1) on June 3, 2014. Note the long rod with handle, standing to the right. This rod was later pushed vertically right up to the handle.

The rocky soil after a burn. Most of the rock fragments are derived from the dolomite bedrock up-slope. Not all the surface is this thick with rocks. The thick soil layer can be found below and between the rocks. Grasses like little bluestem and forbs can grow between the rocks, sending their roots deep into the soil. March 26, 2010

Little bluestem bunches just starting to grow, South Slope (Unit 5), April 11, 2016.
The Slope was burned on March 11, 2016.
Late summer lush little bluestem bunches growing out of the rocky South Slope soil. Sept 27, 2016.
Cross section of part of a typical bluff prairie habitat. The South Slope bluff at Pleasant Valley Conservancy has another layer (Tunnel City Sandstone) below the St. Lawrence Dolomite.

When walking uphill across the South Slope, one crosses over four bedrock layers. Because it is at the top of the hill, the dolomite layer is the most important. In fact, dolomite rock fragments can eventually find there way all the way down the hill. Although loamy (from the loess), they may contain more than 35% rock fragments. These soils are excessively well-drained, so there is never a zone where water is saturated.

“Typically, on these dolomite sites, the loess and dolomite rock fragments are thoroughly mixed.” The soil is generally alkaline (pH greater than 7). At PVC I have found soil pH values as high as pH 8-8.5

Typical plants on the dolomite slope.
Consistent with the general description by the NRCS, our South Slope is covered by large, open prairie. Breaks in the slope, due to changes in the underlying bedrock, may alter the species. The most common species are little bluestem and Indian grass, with scattered forbs across the site.

It is well established that the vegetation of these bluff prairies depends strongly on frequent fire. Without fire the sites gradually become brushed in and/or covered with red cedar. The bluff prairie plants cannot tolerate shade, especially that from the dense red cedar cover, and quickly disappear.

Historically, these dolomite slopes were burned frequently, which maintained the prairie and prevented the invasion by woody plants. Out restored South Slope is burned annually.

Although prairie grass predominates, there are always flowering forbs on the South Slope. Unit 3, Aug 9-2011.

Early fall view of the South Slope. Depending on the amount of summer rain, the grass may be either little bluestem (dry years) or Indian grass (moister years). Unit 3/3A 9-22-2014

Wednesday, April 25, 2018

Finally: Good weather for controlled burns

We’ve been burning so much this spring under marginalweather conditions,  that it was a surprise yesterday to have ideal weather for our burns. Not only did we complete our regularly planned burns, but we were able to re-burn many of the units that had not burned well in the February and March burns. As Amanda said: “The day everything burned REALLY well”.  At 10 AM the temperature was over 50 F and the R.H. was 42%. By mid afternoon it was 70 F with RH around 30%.

Of course it was April 24, very late for us to be burning, but you have to take what you are given. Fortunately (?), the very cold April kept almost all of the plants underground, so they were protected from fires. The few species that had already shown a few shoots above ground should have no trouble re-growing from dormant root-stock.

Why do we burn with marginal weather? Most of our burns involve oak savannas or woodlands where burn conditions are often iffy. However, it is so important to get these burns done that we do them when we can. The idea is that we can create reasonable peripheral black lines and get as much of the interior burned as possible. Then, if better conditions arise later, we can go back and re-light areas that did not burn well. And this is what we did yesterday.

Unit 10 savanna burn of Feb 27-2018. Although black, there is a lot of unburned thatch. 

The same savanna after the re-burn on Apr 24, 2018.
Complete combustion, as shown by the white ash

In contrast to savannas, prairie burns can generally be very successful in marginal weather conditions, provided the fuel is fully cured and the dead fuel moisture low enough. The same day that our savanna burn was not very successful, the nearby prairie burned very well.

No thatch left after this burn of Feb 27, 2018

Wednesday, April 18, 2018

Costs for restoration of savanna and prairie remnants

Restoration of oak savannas and prairie remnants is usually a complicated and expensive process, but real data on costs are hard to find. From time to time during 20 years of restoration work at Pleasant Valley Conservancy I was able to record times involved in various tasks. Since most work involved multiple workers, I have converted the time sheets into person/hours. Areas restored during the same activities were measured either by walking the periphery with a Garmin GPS or by GIS using air photos with ArcMap.

The various work activities shown in the summary table need explaining. Most of the work considered in this post involves removal of woody vegetation, both trees and shrubs. Removal of herbaceous plants, weeding, is a different activity and is not presented. Photos are added to present the context of the restoration activities.

The procedures discussed here have been used on oak savanna or prairie remnants that are “restorable”. That means that they once were “good” remnants but had become seriously degraded because of grazing or lack of fire. They still had some native species and retained small remnant areas.

Basal bark herbicide treatment
One of the most efficient ways of eliminating woody vegetation is basal bark treatment with an oil-soluble herbicide that will penetrate the bark and kill the roots. Since basal bark treatment can be done any time of the year, it is often done in the winter when many other restoration tasks cannot be done. At PVC, 100 foot swaths were marked with flagging tape and workers move along these swaths, treating any target species. The treated plants died during the next growing season and the dead plants were left in place. In a year or two they fell over and slowly decomposed. This works best for scattered plants.

Cut and treat
Denser populations of brush such as honeysuckle, buckthorn, or brambles, were cut with motorized brush cutters, followed by cut stem treatment with herbicide. Depending on the species cut, glyphosate or triclopyr was used to treat the cut stems. This procedure involved a team of people, one operating the brush cutter and three or four following with herbicide spray bottles. This procedure was used primarily on infestations of smaller shrub heights (2-4 feet), and the cut brush was just left on the ground to burn up at the next fire.

Tree work
Many restorations involved the removal of invasive trees such as walnut, elm, cherry, and box elder as well as brush. Often these trees were 10-20 inches in diameter and an experienced crew (contractor) was needed. If the trees were smaller, so that removal was less technical, an experienced chain saw operator could work with a group of less experienced workers. Tree work requires much more time because brush piles must be built, and the cut logs must be removed from the site.

Foliar spray (reprouts after a burn)
A very efficient method of removing brush is to burn the unit (either spring or fall). A properly conducted burn will top-kill the shrubs. In late spring or early summer new shoots will appear and can be sprayed with an herbicide such as aqueous triclopyr. This is a very effective procedure and is less time-consuming than others. There is no cut wood to deal with, and the sprayed plant is usually eradicated.

Foliar spray (fall)
In the fall, buckthorn and honeysuckle retain their green leaves long after all the native vegetation has senesced. Although the timing is variable from year to year, these plants can usually be killed by a foliar spray such as glyphosate or triclopyr. Remember: if it is green, it will be killed. Senesced plants (brown) will not take up herbicide. Glyphosate is preferred because there is no soil residue.

Examples of the techniques  used are given at the end of this post.

The Table
The table is arranged in two ways
  •      By task
  •        By hours per acre from low to high

I used hours per acre to express costs because hourly rates vary widely,. However, I have added a column assuming $25 per hour.

Wooded road bank
Basal bark
Mixed brush
Oak woodland (whole North Woods)
Basal bark
Large buckthorn and honeysuckle
White Oak Savanna (Unit 12A)
Cut and treat
Moderately steep; brambles; honeysuckle; no buckthorn
South slope and basin savanna; 2006
Cut and treat
Mixed small brush; steep terrain
South slope and basin savanna; 2007
Cut and treat
Mixed small brush; steep terrain; snow year
Bur oak open savanna (Unit 11A)
Cut and treat
Brambles and mixed brush
White oak savanna on steep slope
Tree work (contractor)
Many large walnuts to cut
South slope below diagonal trail 1998
Tree work (hourly workers)
Moderate-sized trees and big brush; chipping
Ridge top and basin savanna

Tree work (contractor)
Trees and brush; lots of wood to deal with
East Basin
Tree work (contractor)
Fully closed forest converted to prairie
Bur oak savanna (Unit 8;10)
Foliar spray
Brambles; brush resprouts after spring burn
Bur oak savanna (Unit 10) 2007
Foliar spray
Buckthorn; fall foliar spray
Bur oak savanna (Unit 10) 2008
Foliar spray
Buckthorn; fall foliar spray
East Basin
Foliar spray
Spot spray after clearing and burning

$$ per acre based on $25 hourly rate; other rates are possible, or none, if the work is done by volunteers.

Basal bark is one of the most economical methods of brush control. However, the dead brush is left standing, and one must wait a year or two for the dead stems to disappear. However, it could be used as a preamble to a major tree cutting operation. If it was known that a lot of trees were going to be cut in a unit in a year or two, it would be efficient to basal bark all the woody vegetation. The dead wood could then be used as the base of the brush piles that would be made from the smaller branches of cut trees.

Foliar spray of resprouts after burns is another economical method of brush control. By spraying the resprouts before they get big, one is eradicating the plant and preventing it from getting larger. The principal problem is timing. Not all plants resprout simultaneously, so that it is necessary to canvas each area at least twice, and preferably three times. Also, spraying usually must be done in May when herbaceous weed control is also underway.

Cut and treat on a honeysuckle-infested hillside. One brush cutter and three treaters

Cutting and treating in winter. Light snow is helpful in keeping track of where the brush cutter has been.

Cutting and treating near the Town road makes it easier to deal with the wood.
This is the beginning of the major job to clear the whole South Slope.
Hourly workers were used rather than a contractor

This area had many large trees that had to be cut. Contractor

Bramble resprouts after top-killing from a burn.
This is the ideal stage for foliar spraying

Spraying resprouts. It takes a good eye to locate all the resprouts.
All woody resprouts are sprayed.
A 3-4 person crew is ideal.

Buckthorn green. All the native vegetation has already senesced.
An ideal time for foliar spraying

Four-person crew canvassing a savanna for green buckthorn.
A systematic search of the whole unit is necessary, using marked swaths.